سلام، لطفا به این سؤال انگلیسی که از یک فرد امریکایی طرح شده، پاسخ بدید، ابروی اسلام در خطر است، ممنون؛ لطفا توضیحات کامل و با ارائه منبع بدید ممنون بازم 69:36 وَلَا طَعَامٌ إِلَّا مِنْ غِسْلِينٍۢ (NO food EXCEPT ghislin) In Al-Haqqa Allah says "sinners will ONLY(singular) eat ghislin" And in surah 88 88:6 لَّيْسَ لَهُمْ طَعَامٌ إِلَّا مِن ضَرِيعٍۢ "For them there will be NO food EXCEPT a plant with thorns (Dhari) In Al-Ghashiya allah says "sinners will ONLY(singular) eat a plant with thorns" This is the contradiction I have found, you can prove it's a contradiction through logic and understanding how plural and singular words work in the context of a sentence. 4:82 says أَفَلَا يَتَدَبَّرُونَ ٱلْقُرْءَانَ ۚ وَلَوْ كَانَ مِنْ عِندِ غَيْرِ ٱللَّهِ لَوَجَدُوا۟ فِيهِ ٱخْتِلَفًۭا كَثِيرًۭا "Then do they not reflect upon the Qur'an? If it had been from [any] other than Allah , they would have found within it much contradiction." I have reflected upon the Quran unbiasedly as an agnostic and I have come across this contradiction and I'm looking for answers My question is How do you settle this contradiction with Allahs words? (Please answer with sources, if possible)